US election 2024

Please treat other members in a constructive manner and abide by our Forum Rules at all times.
  • Those three issues are not mutually exclusive in any way whatsoever. It is entirely possible and probable that they are independent and concurrent issues.

    Item 1. Biden is cognitively deficient. Any suggestion that he simply has a stammer is laughable. He is displaying many symptoms of dementia or similar cognitive decline. Its horrible for him and I wish him no ill whatsoever but clearly he is not in good shape and it is impacting his performance.

    Item 2. I don't think there has been any obscuring of criminal wrongdoing, what we have is the lack of political will or stomach to investigate in any thorough manner. The Biden's have links to Ukraine and China which may or may not be legitimate. Biden's son Hunter has numerous indiscretions with drugs and firearms and a job role at executive level in Ukraine for fields of expertise he does not possess at a fantastic salary. All very suspicious and not thoroughly investigated.

    Item 3. If item 1 is true (and it is) then it begs the question who is running the USA? Rumours of Obama's cold hand steering things in the background have been around for ages, but clearly that is just unsubstantiated rumour and just imagine the shit storm if that turned out to be true. Unconstitutional is one word that springs to mind and the means by which the situation came about (insert conspiracy theory here) would make the plot of a great movie. Maybe we have lived through it and just don't know it yet...

    Do I think he's in decline? Yes. But beyond that a lot of what you're saying is just tin hat wishful thinking especially regarding item 2 because that dreaded "E" word I keep asking you about keeps raising it's head... evidence.

    It would appear the latest of the MAGA republicans smoking gun whistleblowers has just been indicted for lying to Congress about what he apparently claimed was going on. The lack of credible testimony from witnesses is only outshone by the total lack of any physical evidence. All that emerged from their deep dive into Hunter thus far has been the dick pics of Hunter Biden that Marjorie Taylor Greene has an unhealthy obsession with.

    As for item 3... how does a bloke who's as cognitively impaired as you reckon he is not give the game away every time he's infront of camera if he's simply a front for another Obama lead administration?

    Besides, for every example of cognitive decline in Biden there's at least one matching example of it on full display with Trump (who would himself become the oldest President ever sworn in if he wins come November - a minor detail brushed under the carpet when it suits)

    Swap Biden's kids for Trump's (and give them official roles in gov't which Hunter hasn't had) and Ukraine for places like Saudi Arabia and apparent actual evidence to show that clan Trump trousered billions from some rather unsavory regimes during Trump's time in office (again conveniently overlooked).

    Whatever drug problem Hunter Biden had is on full current display with Donny Junior. He's clearly off his tits most the time.

    Donald hung around and partied with Epstein, brags about how his fame allowed him to finger relative strangers and get away with it, has been effectively convicted of rape, had multiple affairs, been accused of having golden shower parties with hookers and is about to be in court surrounding his hush money payments to porn stars... and Biden's the supposed pervert?

    When the Democrats describe a lot of what's going on as "projection" my eyes and ears are finding it difficult to argue that they aren't wrong.

    Doesn't excuse Biden of anything he might have done, but when most of the evidence that's out there consistently points in one direction and there's not much else other than wishful thinking pointing the other way - why the rush to defend the established guilty party by pointing fingers at the other? it makes zero logical sense to me

  • Besides, for every example of cognitive decline in Biden there's at least one matching example of it on full display with Trump (who would himself become the oldest President ever sworn in if he wins come November - a minor detail brushed under the carpet when it suits)

    Are you serious Rusty?

    If could would be so kind as to demonstrate how Trump has cognitive decline that is on par with Biden I would be all ears.

    Dementia can set in from the age of 40 so age is not the determining factor in of itself. My Dad died age 94 and he was as sharp as a pin right up to hours before he died.

    Trying to throw Trump into the same dementia pond as Biden is laughable.

    Celebrate it, Anticipate it, Yesterday's faded, Nothing can change it, Life's what you make it

  • Are you serious Rusty?

    If could would be so kind as to demonstrate how Trump has cognitive decline that is on par with Biden I would be all ears.

    Dementia can set in from the age of 40 so age is not the determining factor in of itself. My Dad died age 94 and he was as sharp as a pin right up to hours before he died.

    Trying to throw Trump into the same dementia pond as Biden is laughable.

    Do you believe his BS when he says he deliberately gets things wrapped round his arse to wind up the press - things like the number of world wars we've had, names of people, his own inability to quote dates (or even years) of key moments from his past - basically all the things he claims are signs of Biden's failing mental state. If that attack line is good for the goose...why not the gander?

  • Trying to throw Trump into the same dementia pond as Biden is laughable.

    I'm not. I'm simply saying that for every accusation levelled at Biden there's multiple examples of the exact same thing Trump has either done or is currently doing. A dementia test result is probably the only thing Trump might be on the right side of by comparison. The fact that prat can readily identify a whale doesn't mean he's fit for office.

  • Anybody want to have a sporting guess as to where Donny's tasteless $399 trainers were made?

    A shrewd businessman/wannabe politician would surely go out of their way to 'champion the cause' by pointing out their new range was American made if they were, which begs the following question...

    what's the odds that Donny's daps were made in China/India/anywhere other than the USA?


    He wouldn't put profit before the American people... surely 8|

  • To say that Mr Trumps mental capacity is the same as Bidens is ridiculous.

    The reality is so far away from such a claim it beggars belief that anyone would say that.

    That's akin to saying; that Anthony Joshua is equally as good as Muhammad Ali.

    I Would Rather Be Hated For Telling The Truth Than Revered For Speaking A Lie.

  • To say that Mr Trumps mental capacity is the same as Bidens is ridiculous.

    The reality is so far away from such a claim it beggars belief that anyone would say that.

    That's akin to saying; that Anthony Joshua is equally as good as Muhammad Ali.

    Did I say "on a par with?"

    "Whale!!" :)

  • To say that Mr Trumps mental capacity is the same as Bidens is ridiculous.

    The reality is so far away from such a claim it beggars belief that anyone would say that.

    That's akin to saying; that Anthony Joshua is equally as good as Muhammad Ali.

    Neither is suitable for the role of President of the United States. The distinction you are trying to make between the two is irrelevant, Echo.

    We need someone younger and intelligent in that role, but we are unlikely now to get that this time around.

  • We need someone younger and intelligent in that role, but we are unlikely now to get that this time around.

    That's gonna depend on the courts and any pre election prosecutions I reckon. If the Supreme Court rule against Trump he's toast if convicted as an insurrectionist and If he's forcibly removed from the ballot i'd not be at all surprised to see Biden suddenly withdraw from the race at the last minute.

    He (Biden) would probably lose to a younger and more "level headed" opponent - why the GOP can't see that I don't know.

  • Making an issue of age when one is (going to be) 78 and the other 82 is laughable. If 82 is 'too old'. will Donny Sneakers be abdicating (if he wins) when he turns 82?

    Similar derision to any talk of which of them has a 'better' mental capacity. One is shaky, and the other is psychotic - neither is competent.

  • If the Supreme Court rules against him the USA is toast. It will set the precedent for future political, anything goes, style politics.

    I Would Rather Be Hated For Telling The Truth Than Revered For Speaking A Lie.

  • If the Supreme Court rules against him the USA is toast. It will set the precedent for future political, anything goes, style politics.

    Nonsense. If the Supreme court side with Trump they'd effectively be ripping up the US constitution for the sake of saving an aging orange conman's ass.

    The only think they could comment on regarding him remaining on State ballots (for now) is the presumption of innocence until proven guilty. It's in their interest to get the Jack Smith trial done and dusted regardless of the verdict.

    Bear in mind how much evidence Trump still claims he has to prove his side of the argument. You'd think he'd be really really keen to have that out in a televised show trail if he was right, which begs the obvious question....

    Why's he trying to stall?

    Square that circle for me and I might consider taking his side of the argument a bit more seriously.

  • They can't, their role is to align with the Constitution. As long as they do that I will be extremely happy.

    Youd think the Dems would be really, really, concerned that everything they have thrown at Mr. Donald Trump has failed?

    I Would Rather Be Hated For Telling The Truth Than Revered For Speaking A Lie.

  • If the Supreme Court rules against him the USA is toast. It will set the precedent for future political, anything goes, style politics.

    In what way? They are not going to rule on whether geriatrics can’t be nominated for President, unfortunately.

  • In what way? They are not going to rule on whether geriatrics can’t be nominated for President, unfortunately.

    Because it is obvious Mr Trump is being stitched up. Or to put it another way - if he was not standing for election and as a major threat to the corrupt Dems/Biden - they would not be hunting him down.

    I have yet to see anything, from people who express their dislike of him, in evidence, proving any allegations against him.

    I Would Rather Be Hated For Telling The Truth Than Revered For Speaking A Lie.

  • I have yet to see anything, from people who express their dislike of him, in evidence, proving any allegations against him.

    You'd refute it if anyone did - bit like the multiple indictments and 90 odd charges he's facing. I'll repeat what I said earlier. If Golden boy is innocent and can prove the corruption he claims he has mountains of evidence of and can back up his "Presidential immunity, presidential records act, telepathy counts as declassifying" claims - why's he trying his hardest to avoid his day in court - even in front of a Trump appointed judge in Florida?

    I think deep down you probably know the answer, but on the assumption you're going to run with the whole deep state witch-hunt theory, pray tell what the point is of him trying to win another rigged game if indeed the system is rigged?

  • They can't, their role is to align with the Constitution. As long as they do that I will be extremely happy.

    Youd think the Dems would be really, really, concerned that everything they have thrown at Mr. Donald Trump has failed?

    Failed? He's the best part of half a billion out of pocket in civil trial losses in the past 2-4 weeks alone - all Whitehouse generated fake cases according to Trump. Your definition of failure must really differ to mine

Participate now!

Don’t have an account yet? Register yourself now and be a part of our community!