Re this post in the Israel thread
Let me explain the theory of ad hominem to you .
In a discussion you may attack a post or point but not make personal attacks .
I attack posts .
I don’t like your posts ,I don’t like the hectoring way you conduct them and it is my choice not to answer you .
So maybe you need to reread your own guide and your own posts which very much break it
Hamas regularly uses Ambulances to transport terrorists and armaments . The Red Crescent is also run by Hamas .
Israel is not evil Hamas is evil .
If you don t know the difference your moral compass is askew .
You sound like someone who has to resort to personal attack when they have no viable argument
The region is not stable hasn’t been for decades because among other things it wants the destruction of Israel so it can have yet another failed Arab state from the river to the sea .
It also seeks the establishment of a worldwide Islamic caliphate and its doing pretty well by the insane bunch we see now in our streets
The west is its major target , Israel is the canary in the mine if it goes down so will western civilisation
The world is a lot blacker that you naively imagine I suspect that you haven’t traveled much .
I also read that lot for my sins even the grossly biased BBC
To be honest I don’t like your posts they are IMO a load of BS .
But worst they are mainly an apology for evil
So let’s leave it at that .
And then there's your charmless "I didn’t answer your question because it’s not worth my while arguing with idiots with blocked mindsets ."
I play the ball not the man. Please can you do the same and feel free to give examples where you believe I did otherwise.
I understand it may distress you that I fair challenged your 'not true' but all the evidence of subsequent posts is any distress was because you knew what I'd posted was very much true.