He may attack us anyway
If buts and maybes again, well for certain if we attack him he will attack us, seems to me this forum is full of warmongers, for my sanity I think I'm better off out of here, otherwise I will end up as barmy as you lot.
He may attack us anyway
If buts and maybes again, well for certain if we attack him he will attack us, seems to me this forum is full of warmongers, for my sanity I think I'm better off out of here, otherwise I will end up as barmy as you lot.
No WW3 is not inevitable, and there is no certainty that Putin wants to invade any where other than Ukraine, but it will become a certainty if us and uk start shooting at russian planes, he will retaliate against us that's for sure, we have to tread very carefully and war should be avoided, you have to consider the bigger picture, and maybe turn away.
I agree, but you can't blame the Ukrainians for trying! After all, if the Americans hadn't ultimately come to our aid, Hitler would have taken control of our country during WWII.
Let's just hope that our decision not to get involved doesn't result in Putin deciding to invade other countries. What did he mean when he said 'the worst is yet to come'?
I guess we'll find out soon enough.
It's speculation at best that if we don't get involved that Putin would invade other countries, but it's more or less a certain he would attack us if we did get involved and then it would escalate into WW3 that's for sure.
There is no way other countries should do that, as you say Mike a step too far.
And apparently those specific reactors are some of the biggest in Europe and would have been a bigger disaster than what Chernobyl was. This is the true danger of this war and there's still plenty of contaminated land around Chernobyl that does not need disturbing from ground explosions. Funny how it's the commercial nuclear power that is the bigger threat than nuclear weapons which are highly unlikely to be fired. This is precisely why nuclear power stations are not the way to go for future energy IMO. Then again if every country had them would they act as a deterrent against warfare. Think about it!
That's a thing with war no one gives a damn about the wildlife and environment its just all one giant pissing contest to the humans who instigate it all.
We are all entitled to our opinions,. So please don't try to Tell others what to think. We can just agree to disagree and leave it at that.
An historical provable fact
Well if France hadn't just surrendered and let the Germans walk all over them, probably too busy swigging le vin and necking down cheese and garlic to notice.
If they had not you would be typing in German
Or was that just propaganda and misinformation.
But the rub is, we’ve lost a friendly country, which is now the enemy.
Which will be the next domino? It won’t take long before we have more enemies than friends, with all the implications that entails for our security and our economy.
That’s too short-sighted to ba a practical solution. You can bury your head in the sand for as long as you like, until you are blown out of it.
I don't believe the propaganda being spread by the media or our politicians, other country's will stay our friends as long as we trade with them its all about the money its that simple, we are not the worlds police so don't need to fight everyone else's war for them. Just protect out own country when it is threatened that's all.
I agree with your ‘No’ vote, Ron, but disagree that we should not get involved, at least to the extent of supplying arms, humanitarian items, etc.
As I said before, if we don’t help friendly nations, they will be consumed by the enemy and become unfriendly. This would only spread until we have few friends in the world left.
This planet is a dangerous place and you can’t let the bullies win.
However, Blair and Iraq is different - that war was not necessary for us to fight.
I disagree the attack was not directly on the UK, my opinion is our armed forces should be defending the UK from direct attack nothing more nothing less, as for aiding other countries we should not be selling them arms which could then be turned on us if they so decide, we maybe provide humanitarian aid if no one else will and that goes for any country, but that doesn't extend to letting them infest our country.
I voted no because its not the uks war, getting involved would be no better than Blair taking us to war that was not our buiness.
Unless it's all part of the misinformation 😜
Are the media making it up as they go along or do they actually know or is it just someone's opinion you never know these days, our media also do misinformation. 🤣
The yanks call it collateral damage sounds better than blowing up your allies I guess.
What is Ukraines biggest import?
The Russian military!
Just remind me - when was the last time the US won a war rather than strategically withdrawing?
Well if you ever watch any American made action and war movies its always America saving the world, so in their own imagination they have won quite a few.
Apparently this is Putin's reaction to this thread.
You have a heart of gold Ron.
Really, we either want to control immigration or we don't, we left the EU so we could, no exceptions as far as I'm concerned.
Only a matter of time before the so called refugees start heading this way, the land of milk and honey where the streets are paved with gold. 🙄
I agree he is psychotic enough to push the button
Yeah I agree Biden definitely is, if he can stay awake long enough.